Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Virginia AG Ken Cuccinelli’s book signing indicative of potential governorship: security galore!


The man of the people (of Virginia) Ken Cuccinelli, the commonwealth’s attorney general, needed robust security for his book signing at the Barnes and Noble in Tysons Corner according to Blue Virginia’s Lowell Feld.[1]

Now imagine if Ken Cuccinelli became the next governor of Virginia. How much security would he surround himself with then?! Let me wager a guess and say enough security to fend off a lot of angry Virginians.

From all indications, Ken Cuccinelli gets a kick out of pissing Virginians off who don’t stand on the same ideological razor’s edge as he does. He seems to think it’s a game of realpolitik, ideological zealotry, and just a dash of fun spread into the mix.

Cuccinelli’s in-your-face political style is hardly what Virginia needs in their attorney general, let alone their governor. Compromise, compromise, what is compromise?!

Furthermore, Cuccinelli’s hour-long book signing at Barnes and Noble on Saturday is representative of what a Cuccinelli governorship would look like: short on ideas, high on himself, surrounded by security, and readily accessible only to those individuals who stand on his political side of the fence.

Somehow, a sizable number of Virginians see Cuccinelli as ‘their guy’, the individual who can finally infuse government with…anti-government policies.

But the issue is not government itself. The issue that America truly needs to address is bad governance. And bad governance starts with prohibiting government from filling the spaces that the private sector will not, cannot, or should not fill itself (i.e., Veterans benefits; Medicare; Medicaid, etc.).

Our current political imbroglio’s are not between anti-business and pro-business enthusiasts. Our current political dilemmas are between those who see the necessity of a public-private symbiotic relationship and those who find mutual exclusivity between the two spheres of life in America.

For the Cuccinelli’s of the world, government is a beast that must be tamed. The irony is, of course, that Cuccinelli is the one who has volunteered to seat himself on the saddle of government, a position he is unlikely to use to put that horse to sleep.

Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.[2]



[1] http://bluevirginia.us/diary/8733/video-ken-cuccinelli-surrounded-by-security-at-book-signing-in-tysons-corner
[2] http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/absolute-power-corrupts-absolutely.html

Monday, February 18, 2013

Sen. Adam Ebbin’s cohabitation law comes one step closer to overturning a historic oddity


Amid the bleak results of this year’s session of the Virginia General Assembly, there have been a few bright spots. On Friday, one of those bright spots shown through.

The House Courts of Justice Committee unanimously passed Sen. Adam Ebbin’s[1] bill, SB969[2],which repeals the commonwealth’s 136-year-old archaic law that prohibits unmarried Virginia couples from living together.

Last month, Ebbin’s[3] cohabitation bill passed the full Senate on a 40-0 vote. Now, the full House must vote to pass Ebbin’s bill.

According to Ebbin, census data shows that close to 140,000 Virginians are living together, unmarried. Ebbin also noted that Virginia is 1 of 4 states in the country that still makes cohabitation a crime. Go figure!

Regardless of how frequently the law has been enforced, a repeal of Virginia’s cohabitation law would be a symbolic step in the direction of progress, a sign that Virginia is finally ready to shed those elements of its past that no longer make sense in the present.  

Progress, however, isn’t a word readily associated with the Virginia House of Delegates, so SB969’s movement through the House is by no means guaranteed. Perhaps, for example, unmarried couples living together is a sign of ‘godlessness’ or moral degeneration that should not be condoned[4].

SB969 will be a litmus test for just how in-tune Virginia’s House Republicans are with the opinions of most Virginians. That is, if SB969 fails to pass the full House of Delegates, it will be another demonstration of just how out-of-touch House Republicans are with the rest of Virginia (even if we already know they are extremely out-of-touch!).


[1] http://www.nbc12.com/story/21220119/va-house-panel-backs-repeal-of-cohabitation-law
[2] http://www.richmondsunlight.com/bill/2013/sb969/
[3] http://www.richmondsunlight.com/legislator/apebbin/
[4] http://www.newsplex.com/news/politics/headlines/Va-Governor-Supports-Ending-Cohabitation-Ban-188853831.html

Sunday, February 17, 2013

Cuccinelli’s book signing in Fredericksburg highlights his ability to read & write (& deny science)


So, you didn’t think Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli could write, did you? Well, he’s once again proved you wrong! And just so he could demonstrate his ability to write (and read), Cuccinelli attended a book signing for his new book, “The Last Line of Defense: The New Fight for the American Constitution,” at the Fredericksburg Barnes and Nobles book store[1]. Take that doubters!

Unfortunately, one epithet that Cuccinelli still dons with pride (well, one of many) is his disbelief in science; climate science to be more exact. 

According to Cuccinelli, carbon’s effects on earth’s increasing temperatures are ‘neutral’[2]. Here’s a direct quote from Cuccinelli’s “The Last Line of Defense”: “The EPA was attempting to transform the entire American economy and our standard of living because it said carbon dioxide was a pollutant dangerous to public health. Let’s not confuse carbon dioxide with carbon monoxide, the odorless, poisonous gas that’s also emitted during the combustion of some materials. No, carbon dioxide, or CO2—this “dangerous” threat to America and to the world—is the gas we all exhale from our bodies every second of every day. It’s also the gas that we readily and willingly consume when we have carbonated drinks.” Brilliant!

He’s right, you know. Down with the EPA and public health! Why, after all, should Americans fund an agency that brings…oh yeah, the EPA does contribute immensely to America’s economy![3]

For Cuccinelli, the issue may not even be whether he truly believes the archaic and inane ideas that fall from his mouth. He has found his political niche, staked his public flag, and will ride out this wave of demagoguery and populism until the people of Virginia actually have a chance to vote for his opponent.

But all of my jokes should not mask how threatening Cuccinelli’s ideas are to our continuously warming planet. Were Cuccinelli to put his ideas into play as governor of Virginia, who knows how far back Virginia and the rest of the world would be brushed back against the fight for less extreme climate change.

A win for Cuccinelli is a loss for human and environmental health for generations to come. The truth is all too often something which we don’t want to face.


[1] http://fredericksburg.patch.com/articles/cuccinelli-in-fredericksburg-for-book-signing
[2] http://www.bluevirginia.us/diary/8709/cuccinellis-bookpolluter-freedom-crusade-will-go-to-supreme-court
[3] http://www.epa.gov/oar/sect812/prospective2.html

Saturday, February 16, 2013

The mediator: Lt. Gov. Bolling drops his hat in the middle and calls for compromise on transportation


Quick, someone call a mediator, I think we have another transportation crisis on our hands in Virginia! Ah, there’s Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling, once again playing his newfound role as ‘the middle way’.

On Thursday, Bill Bolling offered this idea at compromise in a letter addressed to 10 members of the Virginia General Assembly[1]: Republicans should give in to new gas taxes while Democrats should cave in to the idea of shifting general fund money to building roads.

Said Bolling in his letter, “Now is the time for compromise and consensus building. It is not the time to draw lines in the sand or take positions from which one cannot retreat.”[2] A little dramatic, perhaps, but Bolling’s fig-leaf has nonetheless been issued!

It’s unclear, however, just how much ‘political capital’ Bolling has to righteously cajole members from either party out of their political entrenchments. That is, Bolling may be whistling in the wind (with a few political points scored along the way).

Even though it’s difficult to forgive and forget Bolling 1.0 (i.e., the pre-middle-of-the-road Bolling), one has to applaud any politician who is willing to wedge himself in between the enmity of two dominant political parties for which partisanship is the rule, not the exception (one party more so than the other!).

In terms of big ideas, Bolling hasn’t actually electrified the political arena, but what he may do (which is even better) is neutralize the effectiveness  of Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli’s political campaign if he does decide to run for governor as an independent.

Indeed, Bolling should run while his profile is bright in the public mind. Why wait another four years when an even more formidable political stud could easily steal the political spotlight? Cuccinelli is a political star, of sorts, but for most of the wrong reasons.

Bolling’s political star would certainly shine a little bit brighter if he can pull off a compromise on the transportation bill that leaves both political parties somewhat less upset than they were pre-transportation bill.
Bolling 2.0 to the rescue!


[1] http://hamptonroads.com/2013/02/bolling-seeks-compromise-taxes-and-general-funds-roads
[2] http://hamptonroads.com/2013/02/bolling-seeks-compromise-taxes-and-general-funds-roads

Friday, February 15, 2013

House Republicans kill senate bill that would have prohibited discrimination based on sexual orientation


A Hollywood movie writer could not have written a better script demonstrating the lack of respect members of the Republican Party in Virginia have for difference and, by extension, the very principles which underlie our country.

On Tuesday, the Virginia House of Delegates subcommittee, House General Laws[1], voted to ‘table’ Senate Bill 701[2], primarily sponsored by Democrats in the Virginia Senate, Adam Ebbin and Donald McEachin. SB 701 was passed last month in the split senate 24-16.

SB 701 would have prevented the government of Virginia from discriminating against individuals based on their sexual orientation. Sounds pretty straightforward, morally sound, and commonsensical, right? Welcome to the twilight universe that is Virginia politics.

Being the cowards that they are, however, none of the subcommittee members who voted against SB 701 will have an official record kept on how they voted[3] (voice votes are not kept on official record). Indeed, why would these tough guys actually want to stand up for their beliefs?

I don’t like to name-call or to assign blame. Plenty of people can do that for me. But when such a foundational principle that imbibes our country is wiped under the rug, it kind of upsets me.

I can take solace in knowing that these individuals and their beliefs are already dead even if their battered remains still inflict mortal political wounds. Their beliefs are truly un-American and have no place in a modern America, an America that values tolerance and shames ignorance.

What does it matter if this or that person wants to be gay? How is it affecting anyone’s life in a real, physical, sense? It’s not, of course.

But for many Republicans in Virginia, dangers are always lurking around the corner. Their politics, in other words, is driven by fear, fears which, on the whole, have no basis in reality (for instance, the government is coming to take my guns!!).

A politics driven by fear is a recipe for degradation as a society and most Americans know it. That is why these conservatives will ultimately lose the political battle. Their ideas, their beliefs, and consequently, their fears, offer nothing but a intolerant and regressive future. How many people truly want to vote for that?


[1] http://delray.patch.com/articles/virginia-house-subcommittee-kills-ebbins-nondiscrimination-bill
[2] http://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?131+sum+SB701
[3] http://dela.house.virginia.gov/chamber.nsf/b2fc8eabf2a8d8f88525753e000dd8e3/e0bf47fdd4b6078285257b1000809597?OpenDocument

Thursday, February 14, 2013

Senate Finance Committee in Virginia passes revised transportation plan


The long and winding road to a reasonable transportation plan for Virginia inched a step closer to passage in the General Assembly on Tuesday after the Senate Finance Committee voted 9-6 to move the revised transportation bill to the full senate.

The bill, if passed, would place a 1 percent tax on the wholesale price of gas, raise the gasoline tax by 5 cents per gallon (doesn’t it seem like that’s happened already!?), and raise registration fees for vehicles that would create funds for transit, roads, and rail transportation.

The entire package could produce an estimated $4.5 billion in Virginia-wide transportation revenue over five years. The $4.5 billion total would be supplemented by an additional $1 billion if the U.S. Congress passes legislation to allow states to collect sales taxes from online retailers. First, though, how about Virginia prove it can actually spend the money it has now on transportation wisely before we feed this inexhaustible transportation monster another $1 billion?

For his part, Gov. McDonnell seemed unwilling to accept the revised transportation bill that passed the Senate Finance Committee. McDonnell said that the proposal passed Tuesday “is much different in scope from our original proposal, although it contains several key elements.”[1] McDonnell said further, “it is important to remember today’s action is not a final bill. Instead, it simply advanced the process of passing a final transportation plan to the next step.”[2]  

One of the key contentions in this never-ending legislative battle over transportation funding is whether or not the gas tax should remain. Senators in both political parties have expressed their support for some kind of gas tax. If the proposal is completely pushed through the General Assembly as it is now, the gas tax would increase to 22.5 cents per gallon.

The Democrats have made the best argument for retaining and increasing the gas tax and not increasing the state sales tax and bleeding off some of that revenue for transportation. What sense does it make to increase taxes on consumers when the point is to change the behaviors of commuters in the commonwealth? 

Regardless of how many new lanes or roads are built in Virginia, the best solution is simply decreasing the number of cars on the road, period.

Until Virginians have an incentive to carpool, take public transportation, or simply drive less as appropriate, transportation will remain a major issue in Virginia, especially as population increases in the commonwealth.[3]  


[1] http://blogs.roanoke.com/politics/2013/02/12/senate-committee-overhauls-mcdonnells-transportation-plan/
[2] http://blogs.roanoke.com/politics/2013/02/12/senate-committee-overhauls-mcdonnells-transportation-plan/
[3] http://www.wdbj7.com/news/wdbj7-virginia-population-growth-outpacing-us-20130129,0,5176267.story

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Republicans in VA House dismantle resolution that would restore rights of non-violent felons


In Virginia, it’s still one mistake and your right to vote is revoked after the commonwealth’s Jacobin conservatives in the House of Delegates disbanded Senate Joint Resolution (SJR) No. 266[1] which would have restored the rights of non-violent felons who have paid their penalties to society.[2]

SJR 266 was not only endorsed by the Democratic Party, it was a priority for Virginia’s Republican governor, Bob McDonnell.[3] So much for handing the governor a political victory.

At present, the power to restore the rights of felons lies at the discretion of the governor. But McDonnell wanted to make the process easier for non-violent felons who have served their time and paid their fines.

“I believe strongly in second chances, redemption and opportunity,”[4] McDonnell said. By implication, those who voted against this resolution don’t believe in second chances, redemption and opportunity.

Of course, isn’t that what America stands for, second chances? At least, second chances is what America used to stand for. But under the groggy and befuddled watch of Republicans who would rather chain Virginia to a past that doesn’t exist anymore, Virginians who make mistakes and get caught will still have to rely on the good will, energy, and political circumstances of Virginia’s chief executive to give them back their rights.

I can’t imagine what it must feel like to be essentially a non-citizen; if you do not have the full rights of a citizen of this county, can you really be considered a citizen at all?

But the beliefs underlying the GOP effort to unravel attempts to give Virginians a second chance at full citizenship is just as troubling as the consequences of their actions.

Their beliefs are so rigid and glued to a world of privilege that they cannot and will not seek to comprehend the hardships that so many average Virginians have to face on a daily basis and the consequent opportunities to make bad decisions. Because if they did, they would readily understand that a person who commits a bad act is not necessarily a bad person themselves, a person unworthy of a second opportunity at complete citizenship.


[1] http://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?131+ful+SJ266S1
[2] http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/va-politics/felon-rights-restoration-gone-for-session-after-proposal-fails-in-subcommittee/2013/02/11/0198fc6c-7495-11e2-8f84-3e4b513b1a13_story.html
[3] http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/va-politics/virginia-legislature-gets-underway/2013/01/09/39a01222-5a90-11e2-88d0-c4cf65c3ad15_story.html
[4] http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/va-politics/felon-rights-restoration-gone-for-session-after-proposal-fails-in-subcommittee/2013/02/11/0198fc6c-7495-11e2-8f84-3e4b513b1a13_story.html