Thursday, January 31, 2013

Sen. Northam’s attempt to nullify ultrasound abortion law fails without debate in committee


Without much ado, or debate, an abortion law written by Sen. Ralph Northam (Norfolk) to nullify a law passed during the previous session of the General Assembly requiring women to undergo an ultrasound before receiving an abortion was stopped in committee without debate on Monday.[1]

Northam’s bill, SB1332, was presented and killed in the Senate Education and Health Committee on Monday afternoon. It was voted against, 8-3.

According to The Virginian-Pilot, things “got testy” when Sen. Steve Martin (no, not the comedian), the committee chairman for the Senate Education and Health Committee, moved to table SB1332 without discussion. Classy, Sen. Martin, classy.

According to Martin, “We have heard that bill now twice.” And yet it still hasn’t sunk it that the ultrasound bill passed in 2012 sucks.

SB1332 is the latest culmination of frustrations between both parties over two seemingly divergent political agendas with little or no middle ground.  And it is no small irony that the Republican Party’s legislation to mandate ultrasounds before abortions can be carried out is more than a slight degree of government intrusion into the individual lives of private citizens.[2]

And this is the real heart of the issue. How far can a government go in the lives of private citizens to legislate moral codes? If Republicans in the Virginia General Assembly had their way, the answer would probably be, pretty far.


[1] http://hamptonroads.com/2013/01/bill-ease-preabortion-ultrasound-requirement-stalls
[2] http://hamptonroads.com/2013/01/bill-ease-preabortion-ultrasound-requirement-stalls

Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Just as every family has ‘that uncle’, every state has their Bob Marshall, an inane politician


Just as almost every family has that crazy uncle, every legislative body in the U.S. probably has their Bob Marshall, the almost comically inane political representative whose main calling in life seems to be agitating the status-quo with ideas built upon fear and anxiety.

It didn’t take long for Virginia’s own Del. Bob Marshall to ‘Marshall’ his way into the New Year with a bill, House Joint Resolution 590[1], that would study the creation of an alternate Virginia currency in silver and gold coins, and he’s for real.[2]

Marshall stated his paranoid factoid for the day, “The stability of our money system can be undermined in any number of ways.” His bill points to the Great Depression and “hyperinflation” as potential causes.

The irony shouldn’t be lost that just as the overwhelming majority of climate scientists are noting the dangers of human-induced climate change, politicians like Bob Marshall roll their eyes and lambast the idea as incorrect or even “crazy.”[3]

Unsurprisingly, those in the Virginia General Assembly with reason (i.e., the Democrats, at least some of them) have called Marshall’s legislation a “waste of time.”[4] Indeed, this is Marshall’s M.O., wasting Virginia’s time and taxpayer dollars, another irony that shouldn’t be lost!

Isn’t this the Republican Party way, however, to cry to the heavens when they haven’t gotten their way, to suggest that the rules should be changed because they don’t benefit the Republicans at this moment in time? I have a vivid image in my mind of the cartoon baby of my youth whose face turns red and whose cries shriek out whenever the baby hasn’t gotten his way. This is the GOP today.

Beyond the fact that state currencies would disproportionately benefit state elites who would have control over the money, we’ve already experimented with separate currencies and to say the least, it was an epic failure.

But history for Bob Marshall holds a number of inconvenient truths that he and his Republican colleagues seem only too willing to ignore to support their ideological ends.

Yes, let’s have separate state currencies and next, let’s go to war with one another over abortion rights! Wow, does that sound similar to another point in American history?

There will probably always be Bob Marshall’s in the legislature of Virginia, and so I hope there will always be enough sense and factual historical memory to nullify their frantic ideas.



[1] http://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?131+ful+HJ590
[2] http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-state-of-nova/post/in-case-of-emergency-pr-william-delegate-wants-to-study-a-separate-virginia-currency/2013/01/28/b70f43fa-6741-11e2-93e1-475791032daf_blog.html
[3] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hEeZ2DsZ7o
[4] http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/va-politics/bill-to-create-alternate-currency-for-va-inches-forward/2013/01/25/8753b766-66fd-11e2-93e1-475791032daf_story.html

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

Cuccinelli’s true calling as a first responder revealed after assisting a trucker on I-64


Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli’s true calling as a first responder was revealed on Friday after he helped rescue a trucker from her rig in Louisa County after it caught fire.

According to WWBT-TV[1], Cuccinelli was heading to Richmond from Staunton on I-64 on Friday when he and his driver noticed smoke from the back tires of a truck hailing a flatbed trailer. Cuccinelli’s driver pulled alongside the truck, alerted the driver to the smoke, and then assisted the driver in putting out the fire.

So in moments when Cuccinelli is not using his office to promote his bid for governor of Virginia or spout off nonsense about the falsity of human-caused climate change, Cuccinelli is truly helping Virginians. Go figure.

Of course, the political capital this incident gives Cuccinelli in the upcoming gubernatorial election probably won’t be lost on Cuccinelli or his campaign staff. Cuccinelli may try to play it off as an act that any Virginian would have undertaken but the incident will certainly be brought up again during his campaign for governor.

All politics aside, Cuccinelli performed admirably and should be praised for it. It is just ironic that his greatest form of public service so far has been on I-64 and not Capital Square.


[1] http://www.timesdispatch.com/news/state-regional/cuccinelli-helps-trucker-when-rig-catches-fire/article_93a03c1a-6fce-5633-aca6-27fa6132674f.html

Sunday, January 27, 2013

Senate Republican attempt to change electoral vote policy may be stopped by Sen. Ralph Smith


Someone should tell Michael Sluss that all players in a room don’t need to be involved in a plot for it to be…a plot. According to the Roanoke Times[1], Virginia Sen. Ralph Smith (Bedford County) is not in agreement with a Republican bill that would reapportion the commonwealth’s presidential electoral votes by congressional district (Senate Bill 723)[2]. At present, Virginia is a winner-take-all state that allocates electoral votes based on the statewide popular vote.

Smith said the legislation is “a bad idea,” adding “What if all states got to skewing it to their advantage?”[3]
And since Sen. Smith sits on the Senate Privileges and Elections Committee, which will hear the electoral vote change bill next week, it could mean the end of this latest effort by Republicans in the General Assembly to skirt or change the rules. There are 8 Republicans and 7 Democrats on the Senate Privileges and Elections Committee.

The impetus for Senate Bill 723 comes in the aftermath of President Obama’s popular vote victory in the state and his collection of all 13 of Virginia’s electoral votes. Had the electoral vote system worked by congressional district, GOP candidate Mitt Romney would have collected 9 out of Virginia’s 13 electoral votes. So it’s not too difficult to see why the Republican Party would want to change the rules to give their party an edge in the next presidential election.

However, like Sen. Smith implied, you don’t go changing the rules of the game every time you lose, especially not in politics. Why? Because doing so creates the strong potential for instability within various political institutions. If the rules are changed by one group after every political loss, the rules governing our political institutions will quickly falter and with it, our entire government.

Both parties (we should get rid of parties altogether anyways) must accept that they will win some and lose some. The Republican Party hasn’t accepted this truth of politics.

This latest attempt to change the rules in their favor is yet another piece of the battlefield mentality narrative that has framed the Republican Party. That is, rules should only be followed if they benefit “us.” But that’s simply not a recipe for a stable republic, both now or in the future.


[1] http://blogs.roanoke.com/politics/2013/01/25/gop-sen-smith-opposes-bill-to-allocate-presidential-electoral-votes-by-congressional-district/
[2] http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?131+sum+SB723
[3] http://blogs.roanoke.com/politics/2013/01/25/gop-sen-smith-opposes-bill-to-allocate-presidential-electoral-votes-by-congressional-district/

Sen. Tim Kaine’s first vote comes on filibuster reform that doesn’t really reform the filibuster


Tim Kaine’s first vote as U.S. Senator from Virginia was a good one and an easy one to make as he voted in favor of a compromise ‘hammered’ out by Sen.s Harry Reid and Mitch McConnell that reforms the filibuster in the senate (kind of).[1]

Said Kaine, “I was honored tonight to cast my first vote as the Commonwealth’s newest U.S. Senator and I’m pleased it comes in favor of a measure to reduce some of the gridlock that has frustrated all Virginians.”[2]

Of course, the filibuster reform doesn’t actually reform the filibuster, at least not much. According to The Washington Post, “The new rules will essentially short-circuit one filibuster vote during the “motion to proceed” to a bill, when the chamber begins considering legislation.”[3] In layman’s terms, the so-called filibuster reform will block small groups of legislators from upending legislation in its initial stage while leaving the “60-vote hurdle” in place that left-leaning Democrats hoped to reform.

In essence, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid didn’t want to change the rules of the game in the senate. According to Reid, “I’m not personally, at this stage, ready to get rid of the 60-vote threshold.”[4] I guess you have to tip your hat to him on principles (or naiveté).

Attempts to place Reid’s motives seem as worthwhile as digging through sand for gold. The bottom line is that Reid has demonstrated again that the liberal agenda is not a heaping portion of his political plate.

For the newly christened Sen. Kaine, the vote still comes off as a win, even if the win counts for little relative to what was hoped for.

Sen. Kaine was also tested on another important issue, the Keystone XL pipeline[5]. His comrade, Sen. Warner, played his hand and it wasn’t a good one. Another strike for Sen. Warner and another check in the plus column for Sen. Kaine.

So far, Sen. Kaine is 2 for 2 in the big issues category. Let’s hope he keeps up his perfect scoring percentage in the senate!



[1] http://luraypagefreepress.com/2013/01/25/kaine-casts-first-vote-in-u-s-senate-in-favor-of-filibuster-reform/
[2] http://www.kaine.senate.gov/record.cfm?id=339397
[3] http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/senate-leaders-reach-deal-modifying-filibuster-procedures/2013/01/24/48a8ca16-6648-11e2-85f5-a8a9228e55e7_story.html?hpid=z1
[4] http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/senate-leaders-reach-deal-modifying-filibuster-procedures/2013/01/24/48a8ca16-6648-11e2-85f5-a8a9228e55e7_story.html?hpid=z1
[5] http://bluevirginia.us/diary/8569/senator-mark-warner-signs-letter-pushing-keystone

Saturday, January 26, 2013

Virginia Senate Republican coup is a golden ticket for indefinite legislative partisan antipathy


Calling Republicans in the Virginia Senate who went along with the redistricting coup scoundrels is an understatement. Calling Prince William County Chairman Corey Stewart a scoundrel after his support of the Senate GOP fait accompli is also an understatement.

After Republicans in the Senate “took up a bill that had called for minor “technical adjustments” to House district lines and amended it on the floor so that it changed lines for all 40 Senate seats,” Prince William County Chairman Corey Stewarts stated, “ In my opinion the Republican members of the Senate acted boldly and justifiably in readjusting the Senate districts.”[1]

Aside from the ethical absurdity of Stewart’s statement, the move by the Senate GOP was more than a “power grab,” it was an unprincipled political act that shames the institution that Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and Patrick Henry (among others) governed under.

When Virginia’s government was conceived, it wasn’t born so that opposing parties could play unscrupulous tricks on one another, like guerilla fighters waiting for the enemy to put down its guard. Rather, Virginia’s government institutions were established to facilitate compromise and cooperation as set out by the spirit and the letter of written rules and regulations.

But the continuing GOP narrative of self-selected rule following and grotesquely out-of-touch political moves  only serves to alienate this group and those who would attempt to justify their platform and their actions.

Bill Bolling, a perfect example of what an individual will do when pulled from the reins of political ambition and short-sightedness, refused to go along with the Senate Republican’s coup to redraw the lines of the Senate. Bolling noted that such a move would set “a bad precedent” and cause such an increase in partisan politics that the agenda for the 2013 legislative session would most likely be derailed[2]. And Lt. Gov. Bolling is most likely right.

In their jaded, fear-centered, states of mind, the GOP continually drives a stake into the heart of any attempt at understanding, tolerance, patience, open-mindedness, and compromise. For anyone who would argue that the Democrats are just as much to blame or even more so need only witness this recent GOP move in the Senate.

It’s said that you reap what you sow, but unfortunately for Virginians, everyone will get a taste of the bad medicine being poured into the GOP’s legislative saucer. Instead of accepting that their extreme political ideologies are not welcomed by a majority of Virginians, these vacuous villains have damned the entire state to another year of almost laughable ineffectiveness.

Here’s to a new year in Virginia, a little more ridiculous than the last.


[1] http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/va-politics/stewart-cheers-va-senate-redistricting/2013/01/24/7416fbd2-65da-11e2-85f5-a8a9228e55e7_story.html
[2] http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/va-politics/stewart-cheers-va-senate-redistricting/2013/01/24/7416fbd2-65da-11e2-85f5-a8a9228e55e7_story.html

Friday, January 25, 2013

Sen. Chap Petersen became the friend of common sense and Virginia cyclists on Tuesday


Cyclists in Virginia may have received a much needed prohibition against the “dooring” of said cyclist on Tuesday after the Virginia Senate passed a bill introduced by Sen. Chap Petersen that instructs vehicle drivers and passengers not to open their doors in the paths of oncoming traffic or cyclists. The bill was passed on a 23-17 vote[1]( and I can’t imagine why anyone would have voted “No” unless…).

Virginia isn’t the only state to have such a law. In fact, Virginia would be among the last states in the U.S. to pass such a law that protects cyclists. I know, you’re probably surprised. According to the WashCycle, 45 states have “anti-dooring laws” on the books already.[2]

You should care because you too might ride a bike someday yourself. You should also care because for those cyclists who do slam into car doors, medical coverage is “often” stopped by friendly insurance companies because no fault has been assigned. Sen. Petersen’s bill would change this equation.

Of course, some Virginian’s still like swinging clubs and sleeping in caves. Witness the piece written by Kerry Dougherty[3] slamming the bill as “embarrassing” and an “asinine measure.” Has she “doored” a cyclist before??!! I think it’s embarrassing that we are still discussing whether or not to protect cyclists for the ravages of car parts.

But the bill isn’t all about cyclist love and car hatin’. For instance, the bill “protects moving cars and drivers, who can be forced to swerve around or hit open car doors in traffic, as well as cyclists.”[4]

This, dear reader, is what could be called progress. What better way to cut down our country’s emissions of greenhouse gases and rates of obesity than by making a push for more individuals to cycle. And what better way to encourage folks to start cycling (or cycle more) than by protecting them from the infamous car door!


[1] http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-state-of-nova/post/fairfax-senators-asinine-bill-to-protect-cyclists-from-dooring-passes-va-senate-easily/2013/01/23/9c277158-651f-11e2-85f5-a8a9228e55e7_blog.html
[2] http://www.cyclelicio.us/2013/an-american-survey-of-dooring-laws/
[3] http://hamptonroads.com/2013/01/openandshut-case-assemblys-foolishness
[4] http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-state-of-nova/post/fairfax-senators-asinine-bill-to-protect-cyclists-from-dooring-passes-va-senate-easily/2013/01/23/9c277158-651f-11e2-85f5-a8a9228e55e7_blog.html

Thursday, January 24, 2013

Seniors allowed to vote absentee while other registered voters in Virginia aren’t so lucky


In what might be one of the few positive headlines coming out of the Virginia General Assembly this session, the Virginia Senate passed a bill on Monday allowing 65 year old Virginians and over the ability to vote by absentee ballot without providing a justification.[1]

Unfortunately, the Senate also stopped a bill that would have enabled any registered voter in Virginia to vote absentee. At present, Virginia law allows voters to vote absentee if they cannot go to polls on Election Day for certain reasons.

The bill to allow seniors the absentee vote was sponsored by Sen.s John Miller and Jeffrey L. McWaters and approved by a 28-9 vote.

Absentee voting has become a popular method for staying away from the polls on Election Day while still casting a vote, which is probably why the Virginia Senate stopped short in allowing all registered voters in Virginia the ability to vote absentee.

With so many alleged problems at the polls though, it is up to debate about how ‘safe’ casting an absentee ballot is. That is, why should an absentee voter feel confident that their vote will be counted in Virginia if all of the alleged voter fraud is taking place?

And it is worthwhile to discuss whether or not opening absentee voting to all registered voters is something akin to allowing a wide group of Virginians to avoid a part of their patriotic duty (i.e., voting in person at the polls). Perhaps it is an anachronism but maybe it’s also a real concern. If we don’t have to make sacrifices, small as they may be to vote at the polls, are we really taking our responsibilities as citizens of a republic seriously?

I’ll leave that question for you to answer, but for my own part I will say that like any ritual, a failure to perform takes away a good deal of the power that accompanies it (e.g., a formal wedding ceremony), or at least it can. In this brave new world, I guess we’ll have to see where new norms and unchained traditions take us.


[1] http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/va-politics/senate-backs-absentee-voting-for-seniors/2013/01/21/433e26aa-6438-11e2-b84d-21c7b65985ee_story.html

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Sen. John Watkins makes his case for uranium mining in the Richmond Times Dispatch


In  piece published in the Richmond Times Dispatch on Monday, Virginia Senator John C. Watkins made a number of arguments in favor of lifting the moratorium on uranium mining in Virginia while countering some of the arguments made by Virginians opposed to mining uranium in the state.[1]

Essentially, Sen. Watkins attempts to make the stately, seasoned politician, argument that goes something like this: I’ve been in the Virginia General Assembly for 30 years now. During that time I’ve been a devoted public servant looking out for interests of Virginians. And now I wish to legislate in the public interest again by lifting the ban on uranium mining, or at least taking the first step towards mining for uranium in Virginia.

I don’t doubt that Sen. Watkins has the public interest mostly at heart. If you ever get the opportunity to speak with Sen. Watkins, you’ll realize that he is a down-to-earth heck of a nice guy. But he’s deluding himself insofar as he thinks uranium mining can be done safely in Virginia.

We simply DO NOT KNOW whether or not uranium mining can be conducted safely in Virginia’s wet climate. There are no other comparable test cases anywhere in the world that Virginians can use as an example of how dangerous uranium mining may or may not be.[2] To suggest otherwise is either a bold-faced lie or a form of self-deception.

But Sen. Watkins also points to the “unprecedented step of requiring the mining company to pay for 100 percent of the regulatory and permitting costs associated with uranium mining activity.”[3] Yes, how groundbreaking a step it is to make a mining company(s) completely pay for a business venture that could reap windfall profits. What’s next, actually making the mining company pay for the inevitable environmental damage they leave behind?

Speaking of which, if an environmental disaster does occur, who exactly is responsible/billable for  the cleanup?!

Sen. Watkins, your “bold legislative move” is simply a tacit acknowledge of how controversial this issue is, especially considering that politicians from outside of Southside Virginia, where this current mining project will take place, have their special interest tainted hands in the cookie jar of what is ultimately a local political issue. Should Southside Virginians be able to decide if Northern Virginia builds a high-speed rail line? No, because it’s an issue pertaining exclusively to Northern Virginians.

But with so much money and political power on the line, it was almost inevitable that non-Southsiders would stick their political hat into the ring.[4]

And as is so often the case when so much money and power is on the line, a simple issue gets obscured and transformed into a complex web of half-truths, quasi-facts, outright lies, and misinformed legislators.

Make all the provisions, make all of the caveats that you will, but until the residents of Southside Virginia give uranium mining a green light, all other arguments and considerations should be left to the side. It is their future, their community, their choice.


[1] http://www.timesdispatch.com/content/tncms/live/TimesDispatch.com/opinion/their-opinion/columnists-blogs/guest-columnists/watkins-uranium-can-be-mined-safely-in-virginia/article_21d8cc25-9899-5364-9df3-b9ec974524a4.html
[2] http://www.energy-net.org/01NUKE/UM-5.htm
[3] http://www.timesdispatch.com/content/tncms/live/TimesDispatch.com/opinion/their-opinion/columnists-blogs/guest-columnists/watkins-uranium-can-be-mined-safely-in-virginia/article_21d8cc25-9899-5364-9df3-b9ec974524a4.html
[4] http://www.vpap.org/donors/profile/index/148831

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Guns-rights supporters gather at the Virginia State Capitol to support rights of gun owners


No one can accuse the guns-rights lunes of lacking energy or a willingness to protest for their views on how the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution should be read because on Saturday, around 150 of them “rallied” outside of the Virginia State Capitol to support the rights of gun owners.[1]

Those who came to Richmond to support gun-owner rights walked the perimeter of the Capitol Square in a symbolic gesture of their vigor and ability to…walk.

The rally comes on the heels of President Barack Obama’s supposedly “sweeping” proposals for gun control. The proposals include reinstating the assault weapons ban; restoring a 10-round limit on ammunition clips; stopping the sale of armor-piercing bullets; allocating funds to hire more police officers; and more.[2] In effect, it’s every Rambo wannabes worst nightmare.

At the rally on Saturday, the Richmond Times Dispatch reported that some in attendance included guns rights supporters from Arlington, Glen Allen, Fishersville, and others.[3]

In the Times report, a woman attending the rally is quoted as saying, “If they had caught me, I would not be here.” The woman was referring to a time when she was a college student and her car broke down in a “bad neighborhood” and she was forced to run from potential attackers. But this story is a red herring and illustrative of the type of messaging that guns-rights groups like the NRA and its followers have used to goad Americans into their corner.

President Obama’s proposals, to be factual, have little to do with all guns. They have a lot to do with so-called “assault weapons.” Did the woman that was quoted above need an assault weapon to fend off her potential attackers? No, unless I’m missing something in the story.

This isn’t to argue that I wholeheartedly agree with restrictions being placed on assault weapons. Granted, I do not see what purpose they serve besides killing masses of people, but I don’t wish to delve into that debate at this point in time.

It is to argue, however, that if Americans are entitled to assault weapons via the Second Amendment, Americans are also entitled to clean air, clean water, and a government that isn’t indifferent to global warming and its effects in order to ensure the pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness! That is, individuals who interpret the Second Amendment as giving Americans the right to buy and own assault weapons are undertaking a form of “legislative creep” whereby the laws of the land gradually become broader and broader in their interpretations on the side of more rights for individuals.

This could be a great thing, but it could also just as easily not be.


[1] http://www.nbc12.com/story/20630914/gun-rights-advocates-rally-at-va-capitol
[2] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/16/obama-gun-control-proposals_n_2486919.html
[3] http://www.timesdispatch.com/news/latest-news/gun-rights-advocates-rally-at-va-capitol/article_174a71d2-626e-11e2-b845-001a4bcf6878.html

Monday, January 21, 2013

Virginia’s unemployment rate drops in December to 4 year low, but Virginia had help


It was announced on Friday by the Virginia Employment Commission[1] that the state’s unemployment rate declined in December to a seasonally adjusted rate of 5.5%, representing the lowest unemployment figure in four years.

December became the third consecutive month that the jobless rate declined, with job increases throughout Virginia in manufacturing and the financial sector. Some sectors, however, took on job losses: trade, transportation, and leisure; hospitality; and professional and business services.

Of course, Gov. Bob McDonnell stressed that the declining jobless numbers equate to more families in Virginia with financial security and continued business growth. The reason according to Bob McDonnell: conservative fiscal policies and Virginia’s “pro-business climate.”

While it’s difficult to argue against Virginia being a good state to start a business[2], many conservatives and libertarians alike act as if these two factors (a pro-business climate and conservative fiscal policies) are the only driving forces behind a growing economy. Just as the myth of so-called trickle-down economics was inflated and wrong, so too are the myths of fiscal conservatism and pro-business policies as the keys to economic growth.

Instead, THE KEY to economic growth is fundamentally education, education, and more education[3]. How can an advanced economy grow and continue to grow if the workforce that the economy depends upon doesn’t have the requisite skill-set? An advanced economy without an educated workforce will be left stagnant.

And more often than not, government spending in the sphere of education is necessary in order to guarantee an education for a large segment of the population.

But there is another crucial point worth noting. Oftentimes when Virginia’s politicians talk about Virginia’s successful economic growth, they talk as if Virginia doesn’t receive help from other levels of government (i.e., the federal government)[4]. Like it or not, Virginia, like the individual, cannot achieve success solely on its own. Sometimes, we all need a little help.

So the idea that Virginia is an island unto itself that has achieved impressive economic growth in the face of an economic recession is, at best, a dangerous myth. Virginia has not acted alone to achieve a 5.5% unemployment rate. It has  (gasp!) received help and that’s not such a bad thing.


[1] http://www.vec.virginia.gov/vec-news
[2] http://www.forbes.com/special-report/2012/best-places-to-start-a-company.html
[3] http://educationnext.org/education-and-economic-growth/
[4] http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_reckoning/2012/10/25/blue_state_red_face_guess_who_benefits_more_from_your_taxes.html

Sunday, January 20, 2013

Virginia Republicans undermine attempt to repeal ultrasound law directed towards women


It’s almost as if Republican members of the Virginia General Assembly wish to isolate key demographics in the state, and on Thursday they appeared to move one step closer. It was on Thursday that Republicans in the Virginia Senate undermined a Democratic Party attempt at repealing a law passed last year that requires women to undergo an ultrasound before receiving an abortion.[1] But there’s more.

Republicans in the Senate also shot down legislation that would have blocked new regulations mandating abortion clinics meet hospital-like building standards.[2]

The Washington Times appeared to point out, though, that some Republican members of the Senate “crossed party lines” to defeat a bill that would have prevented the expenditure of tax dollars to pay for abortions for low-income women pregnant with fetuses that have severe mental or physical disabilities.[3] 

But it wouldn’t surprise me if their rationale for joining Democrats in Senate was much less benign.
Although the argument has been made many times, it never ceases to boggle the mind how perplexing hypocritical members of the Republican Party of Virginia, and elsewhere in the country, are when it comes to individual rights.

When it comes to guns, woe to anyone who would dare take any away. But when it comes to the rights of women, whether it be their right to have an abortion or their right to even seek appropriate medical care in so-called abortion clinics, members of the Republican Party have no trouble infringing upon these rights. And even though their hypocrisy is palpable, they continue along the same policy paths as if no problems in their positions existed.

So what can Virginians do? Virginians can do what voters and concerned citizens should always do, let their elected representatives know that the positions of their Republican Party elected officials on women’s rights are unacceptable.

The old cliché goes that you have to fight for your rights. For women in Virginia in particular, this seems doubly true. But as a society, we rise and fall together. The denigration of rights for one group should therefore be a concern for all Virginians, regardless of gender or political persuasion.



[1] http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/va-politics/va-republicans-block-ultrasound-repeal/2013/01/17/fdba1176-60d5-11e2-a389-ee565c81c565_story.html
[2] http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/va-politics/va-republicans-block-ultrasound-repeal/2013/01/17/fdba1176-60d5-11e2-a389-ee565c81c565_story.html
[3] http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/va-politics/va-republicans-block-ultrasound-repeal/2013/01/17/fdba1176-60d5-11e2-a389-ee565c81c565_story.html

Saturday, January 19, 2013

Bob McDonnell quietly working with feds to implement health care exchange in Virginia


In a hushed political move, the Richmond Times Dispatch recently reported that Gov. Bob McDonnell of Virginia is “working quietly” with the federal government to implement the mandated health care exchange per President Obama’s health care reform legislation.[1]

In December of 2012, the McDonnell administration sought $4.8 million from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to create technology for linking the commonwealth’s human services agencies with the new health care exchange.

According to the Richmond Times Dispatch, “The funding will enable the state to communicate with a federal data center to determine whether Virginians are eligible for Medicaid coverage or subsidies to purchase health insurance through the exchange.”

Although President Obama’s health care reform does not require this technology system to be put into place, the McDonnell administration apparently feels it will be integral for establishing a health exchange that is effective.

Since the beginning of the current General Assembly, a number of bills have been introduced that would direct the State Corporation Commission (SCC) to run a Virginia health benefit exchange while McDonnell has signaled, as early as last week, that he favors a federally managed exchange in Virginia.[2]

The good news for Virginians is that the health exchange appears to be on track for implementation in the not-too-distant future. If this were a transportation project, I would estimate that the exchange would never be completed!

What this means is that over 1 million uninsured Virginians may soon have health care access.[3] That’s more than a political victory, it’s a moral victory as well.

Especially in the wake of the Newtown killings[4], the need for health care access and mental care access in particular have hardly been more forward in the minds of many Americans and more urgent.

Of course, greater access to medical care is not going to be the end-all be-all for a healthier America. Americans will still need to perform the fundamental health care tasks like exercising, eating and drinking healthily, and the like.

That is, in the end, the ultimate predictor of our own health are our lifestyle habits and not necessarily our access to health care. Eat right and live well and maybe that trip to the doctor won’t be necessary! But if it is, you’ll soon have access to health care.


[1] http://www.timesdispatch.com/news/state-regional/government-politics/va-working-with-u-s-on-health-exchange/article_041dbb8e-adc0-5cf5-915e-67e8e16df661.html#.UPffFQ_9TwQ.twitter
[2] http://www.timesdispatch.com/news/state-regional/government-politics/va-working-with-u-s-on-health-exchange/article_041dbb8e-adc0-5cf5-915e-67e8e16df661.html#.UPffFQ_9TwQ.twitter
[3] http://www.ehealthinsurance.com/virginia-health-insurance
[4] http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/01/16/newtown-reaction-obama-guns/1840295/