Friday, August 31, 2012

Bob McDonnell’s speech at Republican convention as memorable as the man himself


Gov. Bob McDonnell’s speech at the Republican convention on Tuesday was, like the politician himself, bland and unimportant. McDonnell employed his usual talking strategy by rhetorically patting his fellow GOP members on the back and showcasing Virginia’s economic progress under his governorship, or supposed progress. McDonnell also took time out of his speech to contrast Republican policies with those of the Obama Administration.

McDonnell stated, “While the Obama Administration borrows over $3 billion a day just to keep the lights on, Republican governors closed $65 billion in budget shortfalls, without raising taxes.”[1] In other words, Republican governors slashed away at the middle and working class while refusing to raise taxes on the wealthiest members of America.[2]

McDonnell also showed off his sense of humor when he remarked, “Imagine that, we’ll have a president who actually knows how to create jobs, and a vice president who actually knows what state he’s in.” Indeed, imagine a vice president who has the nerve to speak off-the-cuff and make occasional gaffes or a president whose attempts to create jobs are overwhelmingly blocked by the opposing political party!

Regardless of whether the vice president is always aware of what state he’s in, unlike Bob McDonnell, Joe Biden and Barack Obama are aware of what state Americans are in and have attempted to provide remedies for our country’s ills, remedies which the Republican Party has never seriously attempted to compromise with.[3]

To McDonnell’s credit, he is one of the few Republicans who have viewed compromise as a political necessity, as a means of getting things done. But McDonnell has also caved in to the most extreme elements of his party on several occasions, putting a question mark around his true policy positions[4].

McDonnell is not, therefore, the political leader of the future. As his speech at the Republican convention demonstrated, McDonnell lacks the vision, the insight, and the vigor that America needs to remain the world’s superpower in the 21st Century.



[1] http://washingtonexaminer.com/mcdonnell-plays-it-safe-on-national-stage/article/2506298
[2] http://www.enewspf.com/opinion/36017-wisconsin-workers-walker-appearance-suggests-romney-ryan-will-continue-class-war-on-working-people.html
[3] http://swampland.time.com/2012/08/23/the-party-of-no-new-details-on-the-gop-plot-to-obstruct-obama/
[4] http://www.theblaze.com/stories/virginia-gop-gov-bob-mcdonnell-flip-flops-on-abortion-bill-libs-liken-to-state-sponsored-rape/

Thursday, August 30, 2012

Cuccinelli predicts that win in NoVA won’t suffice to carry VA in upcoming elections


In order to explain Democratic Party victories in the U.S. Senate, U.S. Presidency, and the state governorship, Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli recently offered the following conclusion: it’s the federal government, stupid!

Cuccinelli, in his infinite wisdom, stated that “They [federal government dependent employees and businesses] are obviously, generally, pro-federal government. And that tends to be pro-Democrat instead of Republican.”[1]

Virginia’s Attorney General then went on to predict that President Obama and the Democratic Party won’t generate enough votes in Northern Virginia to carry the commonwealth. “They’ve got to win so big in Northern Virginia to overcome the rest of the state,” Cuccinelli stated.[2]

Unfortunately for Cuccinelli and his party of old-school, get-your-wife-in-the-kitchen, conservatives, the GOP has a couple of months left to bury itself even further in the upcoming elections with its undisciplined and out of touch public comments like the one made recently by U.S. Senate candidate Tom Smith (R-PA).[3]

With all of the gaffes that have been made by Republican Party candidates, it’s a wonder that the grand old party is even still a relevant political body.

Alas, somehow the GOP remains a viable party in U.S. politics, but with the tensions inside the party made manifest this week in Florida[4], who’s to say that the GOP won’t split into separate political camps, giving the Democratic Party more than enough political room to win comfortably in the November elections?


[1] http://washingtonexaminer.com/cuccinelli-on-nova-were-importing-all-these-people-that-work-in-the-federal-government-and-businesses-associated-with-the-federal-government/article/2506077
[2] http://washingtonexaminer.com/cuccinelli-on-nova-were-importing-all-these-people-that-work-in-the-federal-government-and-businesses-associated-with-the-federal-government/article/2506077
[3] http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/08/27/another_gop_senate_candidate_makes_abortion_gaffe.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+PoliticalWire+%28Political+Wire%29
[4] http://www.blogrunner.com/snapshot/D/2/7/ryan_plays_down_tension_with_ron_paul_backers/

Wednesday, August 29, 2012

U.S. Senate candidate Tim Kaine shows his support of women’s rights in Arlington


As part of U.S. Senate candidate Tim Kaine’s campaign to demonstrate his concern for women’s rights, the former Virginia governor attended a Planned Parenthood “Women are Watching” bus tour stop in Arlington.

At the stop, Kaine reconfirmed his support for health care choices being made by women in addition to lambasting attempts by elected representatives to limit health care access for women.

Kaine stated, “Women’s lives are not political issues, women’s lives are not wedge issues. Women have the ability to make their own health care decisions and their own moral decisions.”[1]

By contrast, the so-called small government conservative challenger for the U.S. Senate seat in Virginia, George Allen, has favored government legislation that would define personhood as beginning at conception, thereby constraining the rights of women to pursue abortions.[2] Presumably, Allen’s anti-abortion position would also apply to women who have been raped.[3]

In the case of women’s rights then, the two candidates for U.S. Senate in Virginia couldn’t be much more different. Tim Kaine supports and respects the rights of women while George Allen hides his lack of respect for women’s rights behind a “right to life” moral philosophy.

Therefore, if you’re a woman who thinks you know how to make your own health care decisions, then George Allen clearly isn’t the senate candidate you want to place your vote for, period.

But if this reason isn’t enough to deter you from voting George Allen, the senate candidate also authored a Balanced Budget Amendment.[4] Can you guess who the economic “balance” would weigh most heavily upon? Here’s a clue: probably not the super wealthy of America.


[1] http://fairfaxnews.com/2012/08/kaine-joins-planned-parenthood-rally/
[2] http://www.ontheissues.org/social/George_Allen_Abortion.htm
[3] http://www2.newsadvance.com/news/2012/aug/27/mcdonnell-defends-gop-platforms-abortion-plank-wit-ar-2153204/
[4] http://www.ontheissues.org/senate/George_Allen.htm 

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

Bob McDonnell defends anti-abortion positions that doesn’t exempt raped women


Gov. Bob McDonnell threw his hat in the ring with extreme members of his Republican Party on Sunday when he defended the anti-abortion position that includes no exception for women who are raped, implicitly supporting the besieged U.S. Senate candidate Todd Akin.

On ABC’s “This Week” TV show, McDonnell smugly commented, “I don’t think it’s any surprise that the Republican Party is the party that embraces the dignity and sanctity of life.”[1] Apparently McDonnell wasn’t thinking of the same Republican Party that uses the death penalty like America is still living in the Wild West.[2]

McDonnell also added, “What matters in this race…as everybody knows, is how we’re going to get the greatest country on earth back to work and out of debt.” Again, this statement coming from a member of the political party who has all but publicly stated that it is ready and willing to sink the U.S. economy if its policy demands are not met.[3]

In the skewed world of the Republican Party, defending the sanctity of life can mean nullifying the life of those deemed to be transgressors of the GOP’s “right to life” moral code. Furthermore, “getting America back to work” has all too often meant “putting more money back into the hands of the super wealthy.”

When and if posterity shines a spotlight back on this period of U.S. political history, I’d like to imagine that the Republican Party will be renamed the “Bubble Party,” the party that was so trapped inside of its parochial and hypocritical philosophical beliefs and so hell-bent on achieving and maintaining political power, that it was willing to let the country crumble beneath its feet.

Monday, August 27, 2012

Some VA General Assembly members say Port of Virginia timetable too “aggressive”


The “aggressive” timetable which the Virginia Department of Transportation and Virginia Port Authority have set to privatize the port authority’s operations[1] has raised the eyebrows of some within the business-friendly Virginia General Assembly., including Del. James Massie (R-Henrico County)[2].

According to Massie, the timetable for the business decision doesn’t leave the appropriate amount of time for deliberation.[3] “You’re talking about a significant business decision,” Massie noted, “This schedule is just too aggressive.”[4]

Even though the chairman of the Virginia Port Authority stated that the announced schedule was not set in stone, the secretary of the Treasury, Sean T. Connaughton, appeared to signal the need for a speedy decision.

According to Gov. Bob McDonnell, the Port of Virginia has a $41 billion yearly impact on Virginia’s economy.[5] However, the McDonnell administration has signaled concern over the projected yearly operating loss of $10 million for the last fiscal year.

Thus, there appears to be some disagreement between members of Virginia’s General Assembly and the McDonnell administration about how soon, or even if, the Port of Virginia should be privatized.

If the McDonnell administration was hoping for a quick sale, James V. Koch’s remarks before state officials on Friday probably buried that hope. “My analysis suggests that there is room for the commonwealth to negotiate a more attractive arrangement if it decides to accept one of the management proposals in front of it now,” Koch said.[6]

In his eagerness to appear like Virginia’s business white-knight, McDonnell has made sweetheart business deals in the recent past which haven’t been as favorable to the commonwealth as might otherwise have been the case[7].

So let’s hope that McDonnell learns from his own mistakes and slow-walks this process to ensure that Virginia does get the most bang for its buck. What better way to show off your business acumen?


Sunday, August 26, 2012

A Goode mix: Virgil Goode is poised for the 2012 presidential ballot, a Romney spoiler


The presidential election just got a little more interesting in Virginia after former VA Congressman Virgil Goode delivered 20,500 signatures to the State Board of Elections to qualify for the presidential ballot.[1] If the signatures are upheld in Virginia, Goode’s name on the presidential ballot could play the spoiler for Mitt Romney’s presidential ambitions.

State Board of Election officials will now send the signed petitions to local registrars to verify their authenticity.

Earlier this week, a Republican Party challenge to the validity of the Constitution Party’s signed petitions in Pennsylvania forced Goode and his running partner, James Clymer, to drop off of the presidential ticket. If the Republican Party smells blood in Virginia, it is likely to repeat this maneuver.

To many conservative Americans, including Virginians, Goode’s policy positions on immigration, Medicare, abortion, and gun rights, present a more attractive presidential choice than those offered by President Obama and presidential candidate Romney, even though the latter has proclaimed many of the same policies.

Thus, Goode could play the role that Ralph Nader played in the 2000 presidential election between Al Gore and George W. Bush: the role of spoiler.  In that election, Nader “pulled” from Al Gore’s voting bloc, chiseling away at the popular vote that Gore was able to garner.[2]

If nothing else, Goode’s presence in the presidential race could cause Team Romney to move even further to the right of the political spectrum to prevent Goode from staking claim to that position. If Team Romney were to make this political move, it could isolate the all-important independent voters in key swing states like Virginia.[3]


[1] http://washingtonexaminer.com/former-rep.-virgil-goode-hands-in-20000-signatures-to-make-virginia-presidential-ballot/article/2505808
[2] http://articles.cnn.com/2008-02-24/politics/nader.politics_1_ralph-nader-democrats-can-t-landslide-presidential-race?_s=PM:POLITICS
[3] http://news.vanderbilt.edu/2012/08/anti-obama-ad-earns-romney-independents/

Saturday, August 25, 2012

President Obama’s latest TV ad in Virginia features Bill Clinton and the economy


In President Barack Obama’s latest TV advertisement airing in Virginia, former U.S. President Bill Clinton touts the economic advantages of an Obama reelection[1].

In the ad, Clinton says “This election to me is about which candidate is more likely to return us to full employment.” Clinton continues, “President Obama has a plan to rebuild America from the ground up, investing in innovation, education and job training. It only works if there is a strong middle class.”[2]

Clearly then, both presidential camps, Team Obama and Team Romney, will be fighting for the hearts and votes of middle class America, each side trying to convince America’s middle class that they are the “clear choice.”

In the same TV ad, Clinton explains that “The Republican plan is to cut more taxes on upper income people and go back to deregulation.”[3]

Team Romney responded to the Clinton ad by suggesting that “middle-class families are working harder and harder for less and less.” Moreover, Romney’s successful experience in the private sector will offer America “a new direction,” according to Team Romney.

But from where I’m sitting, Team Romney is offering the same economic prescription that has fueled the Republican Party’s rhetoric since the “glory days” of Ronald Reagan. Cut taxes, roll back government services, and watch America gush with surplus dollars. Unfortunately, trickle-down economics didn’t work the first time it was initiated and it won’t work in the present either.[4]

The government got more involved in the everyday lives of Americans because the wealthy had gone unchecked and America’s future was put in jeopardy[5].

As much as I would like to believe that the “free market” is the answer to all of our prayers, history tells us differently. President Obama and the Democratic Party have a better grasp of this idea.

In the words of Bill Clinton, “We need to keep going with his [President Obama’s] plan.”[6]


[1] http://www2.timesdispatch.com/news/2012/aug/23/new-obama-ad-va-other-key-states-features-bill-cli-ar-2150864/
[2] http://www2.timesdispatch.com/news/2012/aug/23/new-obama-ad-va-other-key-states-features-bill-cli-ar-2150864/
[3] http://www2.timesdispatch.com/news/2012/aug/23/new-obama-ad-va-other-key-states-features-bill-cli-ar-2150864/
[4] http://useconomy.about.com/od/Politics/p/Trickle-Down-Economics-Does-It-Work.htm
[5] http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/snprelief1.htm
[6] http://www2.timesdispatch.com/news/2012/aug/23/new-obama-ad-va-other-key-states-features-bill-cli-ar-2150864/

Friday, August 24, 2012

Veep-candidate Paul Ryan calls presidential election a “choice” in Roanoke on Wednesday


Vice-presidential candidate for Team Romney, Paul Ryan, spoke to supporters on Wednesday at Northwest True Value Hardware in Roanoke County, Virginia.[1]

Ryan laid down the upcoming presidential election as a choice between a “welfare state,” as represented by President Obama, and an “entrepreneurial society,” as represented by Ryan himself and Mitt Romney.
According to Ryan, “He [President Obama] inherited a difficult situation. Here’s the problem: He made it worse. He can’t run on accomplishments. It’s a failed record.”[2]

Perhaps, however, had the Republicans in the Congress not fought EVERY Obama administration economic proposal (or just about), President Obama’s so-called “failed record” could have been avoided.

All of this assumes, of course, that President Obama has a failed economic record to begin with. But what economic policies would Romney pursue were he to become America’s next president?

At the rally on Wednesday, Ryan came no closer to spelling out specific economic policies that a Romney administration would pursue if elected. What Ryan did offer is the usual Republican Party one-liner: “The key, the centerpiece, is to champion small businesses.”[3] In what way does the Romney-Ryan duo plan to “champion small businesses”?

As CEO OF Bain Capital, Mitt Romney was anything but a champion of small business.[4] A predator would be a more apt description.  

But Romney’s faulty memory about his record at Bain also highlights another reason why the Romney-Ryan presidential ticket is a bust: Romney doesn’t seem capable of filtering the truth from falsehoods.[5]

So why would anyone want Mitt Romney as their president when his tune changes as quickly as the wind?  


[1] http://www.roanoke.com/news/breaking/wb/313075
[2] http://www.roanoke.com/news/breaking/wb/313075
[3] http://www.roanoke.com/news/breaking/wb/313075
[4] http://articles.boston.com/2012-08-12/magazine/33126913_1_bain-private-equity-sweet-returns
[5] http://www.blufftontoday.com/bluffton-opinion/2012-08-22/tell-me-lies-tell-me-sweet-little-lies

Thursday, August 23, 2012

U.S. Department of Justice approves Virginia’s new voter ID law, a GOP victory


Gov. Bob McDonnell announced Monday night that the U.S Department of Justice had approved Virginia’s new voter ID law[1], effectively allowing the law to go into effect in time for Election Day.

According to McDonnell, officials from the Justice Department concluded that the new voter ID law does not violate the Voting Rights Act. Under the law, Virginians will no longer be allowed to vote without identification, but the types of identification accepted at the polls was also expanded.[2]

In his announcement, McDonnell stated that “The legislation I signed into law is a practical and reasonable step to make our elections more secure while also ensuring access to the ballot box for all qualified voters.”[3]

While the “secure voting” argument may sound reasonable, it excludes the fact that voter ID laws across the country have been written and passed exclusively by the Republican Party. What some critics say these laws amount to are a new poll tax and literacy test created primarily to restrict the votes of minorities, a voting bloc that usually votes for the Democratic Party.[4]

Another piece of evidence that takes away from the “secure voting” argument is that no widespread voter ID fraud had been discovered in Virginia until well after the new voter ID legislation was being pushed around in the VA General Assembly.[5] That is, Virginia’s legislators hadn’t known about widespread voter fraud before they began legislating to “secure voting.”

For the present, the consequences of the new voter ID law for registered voters in Virginia is unclear. But in a time and place where every law has a political goal in mind, it’s hard to imagine that this GOP brainchild will not in some way benefit Virginia’s Republican Party.


[1] http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/virginia-lawmakers-split-bitterly-over-voter-id/2012/02/02/gIQAxj2NnQ_story.html
[2] http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/virginia-politics/post/justice-department-upholds-virginia-voter-id-law/2012/08/20/76d609f6-eb2a-11e1-a80b-9f898562d010_blog.html
[3] http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/virginia-politics/post/justice-department-upholds-virginia-voter-id-law/2012/08/20/76d609f6-eb2a-11e1-a80b-9f898562d010_blog.html
[4] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/debbie-hines/voter-id-is-the-new-poll-tax_b_1797394.html
[5] http://www2.timesdispatch.com/news/2012/apr/22/tdmain01-va-investigates-voter-fraud-ar-1859666/

Wednesday, August 22, 2012

City of Charlottesville seeks stiffer criminal penalties for noise violations


Oftentimes, solving a social problem with education has longer-term benefits than passing or updating a law, and in the case of the University of Virginia[1] the problem is loud house parties. The City of Charlottesville recently considered redefining noise violations[2] as a Class 2 misdemeanor for first and second offenses. 

Noise violations have been a Class 4 misdemeanor, the lowest on the misdemeanor scale.[3]
Under the pending city code change, the maximum fine would increase to $1,000 for first-time offenders with up to six months of jail time also possible. Second-time offenders would face up to $2,500 in fines and up to 12 months in jail.

According to Charlottesville’s director of Neighborhood Development Services, Jim Tolbert, “They [the city of Charlottesville] don’t intend to use jail unless someone is absolutely being a jerk.”[4] How exactly “being a jerk” is defined will apparently be left for future city councils to decide.

The stiffer criminal penalties for noise violations come on the heels of resident complaints of repeat violations of the noise ordinance in the neighborhoods of Venable and University Circle.

As is the case with many social problems, however, education may be the better alternative relative to harsher criminal laws.

What the stiffer laws DO accomplish is instilling a sense of heightened anxiety about throwing a raucous party or get together at the University of Virginia, not a thoughtful understanding of why noise violations should be avoided.

In order to create better citizens, education is oftentimes the best solution. Although harsher criminal penalties for noise violations may be an easier, or even more practical solution, we err as a society when we continuously take the easiest path towards a narrow end.

There will probably be a drop in noise violations, but will better citizens also come about as a result of the updated city codes?


[1] http://www.virginia.edu/
[2] http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-a-noise-ordinance.htm
[3] http://www2.timesdispatch.com/news/state-news/2012/aug/20/charlottesville-seeks-quiet-uva-parties-tougher-no-ar-2142024/
[4] http://www2.timesdispatch.com/news/state-news/2012/aug/20/charlottesville-seeks-quiet-uva-parties-tougher-no-ar-2142024/

Tuesday, August 21, 2012

George Allen wants the votes of veterans but GOP would rather slash veterans’ benefits


U.S. Senate candidate George Allen was out-and-about in Dale City on Saturday, shaking hands and talking with voters at a veterans’ roundtable discussion at Veterans of Foreign Wars Post 1503.[1]

Speaking at the roundtable discussion, Allen commented, “We do need to be able to reach and to respond to protect our liberties here at home, no matter what the threat may be…”.[2]

Allen further commented that America needs to retake the reins to its own destiny through a strong economy which can buttress a strong military.

However, it’s ironic that a Republican political candidate would be advocating a strong economy and military when the very same party has done the most to undermine each.[3]

President Obama has stated that veterans’ benefits won’t be slashed through sequestration while President George W. Bush did much to reduce the benefits received by America’s veterans. Furthermore, the GOP as a whole has voted against 7 bills that would aid veterans.[4] These Republican Party efforts are hardly an inducement for American’s to serve and potentially die for their country.

But Allen desperately wants Virginia’s veterans to throw their voting weight behind him. Allen said, “Another thing is we need to keep our promises to our veterans and their families for the benefits they’ve earned…”.[5]I couldn’t agree more but the GOP has sought to do otherwise.

So why vote for a political candidate whose political party is clearly inimical to your interests? If you’re rational about your decision, you wouldn’t. That’s why Virginia’s veterans should throw their voting weight behind Tim Kaine and the Democratic Party, a candidate and a party that has proven it will look out for the interests of America’s veterans.[6]