Thursday, August 2, 2012

VA coalition outlines opposition to privatizing sex offender rehabilitation in letter to Gov. McDonnell


Don’t worry, we’ll just privatize that, or maybe not so fast. On Monday, eleven organizations sent letters to Gov. McDonnell outlining their opposition to privatizing a state facility[1] that holds violent sex offenders for treatment after their sentences are completed.[2]

The rationale behind the consideration for privatizing the Virginia Center for Behavioral Rehabilitation (VCBR)[3] in Burkeville surrounds, not surprisingly, money. The state is considering privatization as a way to “control costs” of Virginia’s civil commitment program.

According to the Richmond Times-Dispatch, Virginia (i.e. taxpayers) spends close to $97,000 a year to “treat” every sex offender at the rehabilitation facility.[4] Moreover, the program’s budget has gone up tenfold since it began in 2004.

Even more worrying to Virginia’s lawmakers is the projected number of offenders who could need treatment by 2016 unless the program’s growth is reduced.

In turn, the coalition of civil rights, labor, and religious and criminal justice reform organizations who sent its letter to Gov. McDonnell argued that “What is currently an overcrowded situation at VCBR could become dramatically worse if run by a company that increases its profits at the expense of programs and operations, including security.”[5]

Thus, the coalition’s argument hinges upon the belief that a private company would exploit the market in sex offenders, so to speak, to turn a greater profit, instead of attempting to reduce the amount of sex offenders. The coalition has also argued that the private companies that submitted proposals have had problems managing other facilities.

The first argument made by the coalition is a logical conclusion given the tenets of capitalism. Why, that is, would a private company put itself out of business by fixing the problem that makes it money? More than likely, it wouldn’t, and that’s why the state has to fill this important role.

Secondly, leaving the rehabilitative services of violent sex offenders to companies with checkered pasts is like leaving a wounded lion to be healed by a poacher. If you want to heal someone, leave the job to someone whose interests are to heal.

Privatization appears at first glance like an attractive short and long-term solution with few negative repercussions attached. Unfortunately, some services do belong in the state’s hands, and the rehabilitation of violent sex offenders is one. The price to Virginians may be high, but the price for the alternative will be higher.


[1] http://www2.timesdispatch.com/news/virginia-politics/2012/jul/31/privatization-va-sex-offender-program-opposed-ar-2096318/
[2] http://goaskalice.columbia.edu/sex-offender-forever
[3] http://www.vcbr.dbhds.virginia.gov/
[4] http://www2.timesdispatch.com/news/virginia-politics/2012/jul/31/privatization-va-sex-offender-program-opposed-ar-2096318/
[5] http://www2.timesdispatch.com/news/virginia-politics/2012/jul/31/privatization-va-sex-offender-program-opposed-ar-2096318/

No comments:

Post a Comment