After ‘slipping’ through the General Assembly, student
campus organizations are asking Gov. Bob McDonnell to forgo his signature on
legislation that these organizations argue would give “campus organizations the
right to discriminate.”[1]
The legislation in question was sponsored by Sen. Mark D.
Obenshain (Harrisonburg) and Del. C. Todd Gilbert (Shenandoah). The bill passed
easily in the House (shocker!) and narrowly in Virginia’s Senate.
The legislation takes aim at nondiscrimination policies that
are present among many of Virginia’s student organizations by giving political
or religious student organizations at public institutions “the right to define
their doctrines and limit membership to students committed to their missions.”
According to the president of the University of Mary
Washington Student Government Association, Jeremy Thompson, “It’s [the bill
that Thompson has requested Gov. Bob McDonnell reject] very vague and ambiguous
and contrary to our beliefs as a university.” The bill “would pretty much make
our policy of inclusion null and void. It goes against a lot of what our
university stands for.”[2]
Indeed, for legislators who tout the virtues of individual
liberty and the like, this Republican-sponsored and heavily Republican-favored
bill unequivocally sets the stage for legal discrimination. The last time I
checked, discrimination is not a way of enhancing individual liberty.
The ACLU agrees, seeing the bill as a means of overriding a
U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld a university’s right to require student
organizations to abide by nondiscrimination policies.[3]
To be fair, I understand the reasoning behind the bill in
the minds of its Republican Party sponsors: how do you prove that an individual
who signs up for Organization A is truly committed to its mission? While this
is a good question and one that warrants further discussion, setting up
discriminatory barricades isn’t the right answer. Indeed, allowing for legal
discrimination will undoubtedly lead to even more hard-to-answer questions
while limiting the ability of certain groups of Virginians to join
organizations they may very well be committed to.
[1] http://www.timesdispatch.com/news/students-question-intent-of-campus-bill/article_342007a0-e80f-57c7-b292-9ba840036423.html
[2] http://www.timesdispatch.com/news/students-question-intent-of-campus-bill/article_342007a0-e80f-57c7-b292-9ba840036423.html
[3] http://www.timesdispatch.com/news/students-question-intent-of-campus-bill/article_342007a0-e80f-57c7-b292-9ba840036423.html
No comments:
Post a Comment