Saturday, June 9, 2012

After the dust has settled on gay marriage, the political damage appears minor


After the dust settled on the issue of gay marriage, it appears that all of the political anxiety and fuss was unwarranted, at least according to a new Quinnipiac University survey of 1,282 registered voters in Virginia.[1]

The survey showed that while the issue of gay marriage is a deeply divisive issue, a majority of the registered voters surveyed said gay marriage won’t affect their vote in the upcoming presidential election.

Out of the 1,282, 25% said that same-sex marriage was “extremely important” or “very important” to them.
Interestingly, and disturbingly, GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney received a greater “more likely” to vote for him response due to his opposition to gay marriage than President Obama’s recent statement of support for gay marriage.[2]

Gay marriage has been the 21st Century’s biggest struggle for civil rights, akin to the Civil Rights Movement that spread across the southern states of the U.S. in the mid-20thCentury. [3]

While this may be an obvious point, what is less obvious is why such a sizable minority of Virginians are so opposed to what is essentially an issue of individual freedom, a value that is so embedded in the “fabric” of America, let alone Virginia.

What individuals opposed to gay marriage appear to fear is the “slippery slope” or supposedly moral degradation and social fracture stemming from its institution. While some traditions and customs should be retained in any society, individuals who argue against gay marriage seem to forget that the freedom of each individual to freely choose who they’ll wed IS part of America’s greatest tradition, individual freedom in general.

The real slippery slope begins when we start asserting that this or that social phenomenon that falls under the aegis of individual freedom is not worth legally or informally protecting. Maybe someone in Virginia feels that long hair is also a means of social degradation, should we criminalize long hair too? No, of course not.

Ultimately, gay marriage comes down to the same bottom line: same-sex individuals who want to marry should have the freedom to do so, period.


No comments:

Post a Comment