Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Both political parties weigh in on the GOP decision to hold a closed convention for governor


Speaking out about the Virginia GOP’s decision to move forward with a closed convention to pick a gubernatorial candidate in 2013, Democrat Chris Dumler commented that “I think that’s what he was hoping for, that’s what he was planning for, and it seems that the state GOP kinda pulled the rug out from under him [Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling].”[1]

Indeed, even some Republicans in Virginia are up in arms over the Virginia Republican Party’s turnaround decision on Friday. Republican Ken Boyd stated, “I think you get much broader participation if it’s a primary instead of a convention…”.

But no one should really be surprised that the state GOP pulled a quick one over the head of Lt. Gov. Bolling. It shouldn’t be a secret by now that the Republican Party in general is willing to play by whichever set of rules leads to a surer victory, even if that means few rules or no rules at all.

Ken Cuccinelli is clearly the favorite among Virginia’s Republican voters for the governorship and arguably a much greater political “stud” than his Republican rival Bill Bolling.[2]

Add these two elements up, the GOP’s philosophy of ends above means[3] and Cuccinelli’s popularity, and you have the perfect recipe for a decision reversal regarding a convention or a primary.

Unfortunately, the power politics behind the decision will leave thousands of Republican voters in Virginia “disenfranchised”[4], effectively chipping away at the democratic process that Gov. McDonnell has turned into an art form during his tenure as governor of Virginia.[5] Only this time around, the main group of disenfranchised voters will be Republican voters themselves.

An ironic turn-around to be sure, but one that all Virginians should be concerned with.

No comments:

Post a Comment